<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fedora business cards, take two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Weller</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>@subdivisions: Yeah, I&#039;ve considered that, but I think Fedora is going to want to decide on *one* design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@subdivisions: Yeah, I&#8217;ve considered that, but I think Fedora is going to want to decide on *one* design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subdivisions</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>subdivisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Looks pretty polished to me.  Personally, I like the reverse side from the first take, but I can understand the need to avoid the costs associated with double sided printing.  Would you consider having separate templates for the reverse so those who want to print two sided cards can do so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty polished to me.  Personally, I like the reverse side from the first take, but I can understand the need to avoid the costs associated with double sided printing.  Would you consider having separate templates for the reverse so those who want to print two sided cards can do so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Weller</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>@Máirín: Also, a single vertical bar on the side does not work well with an inverse Fedora logo, which I maintain should be on the card somewhere. It adds a bit of punch, instead of looking boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Máirín: Also, a single vertical bar on the side does not work well with an inverse Fedora logo, which I maintain should be on the card somewhere. It adds a bit of punch, instead of looking boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Weller</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>@Máirín: I&#039;ve been going off what could be done with templates such as these from Avery -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://qurl.org/4v&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://qurl.org/4v&lt;/a&gt;

There are no bleeds, unfortunately. I understand your concern, but if there are no bleeds, than a very thin second blue bar will appear nonetheless.

I have thought about making the second blue bar smaller than it currently is; I&#039;ll probably try to make some examples with all the different feedback I&#039;ve received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Máirín: I&#8217;ve been going off what could be done with templates such as these from Avery &#8212; <a href="http://qurl.org/4v" rel="nofollow">http://qurl.org/4v</a></p>
<p>There are no bleeds, unfortunately. I understand your concern, but if there are no bleeds, than a very thin second blue bar will appear nonetheless.</p>
<p>I have thought about making the second blue bar smaller than it currently is; I&#8217;ll probably try to make some examples with all the different feedback I&#8217;ve received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Máirín</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Máirín</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Ian, you can design the template for the cards such that it has a bleed wide enough that you don&#039;t have to worry about cutting too far.

Most business card templates you can buy at office max or wherever have a decent bleed for this reason.

I do maintain that the double-bars I think stray from the Fedora identity.

Have you tried doing a single vertical bar instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, you can design the template for the cards such that it has a bleed wide enough that you don&#8217;t have to worry about cutting too far.</p>
<p>Most business card templates you can buy at office max or wherever have a decent bleed for this reason.</p>
<p>I do maintain that the double-bars I think stray from the Fedora identity.</p>
<p>Have you tried doing a single vertical bar instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparks</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what everyone is talking about.  I like the new cards and I really like the blue bars at the top and the bottom.  It really frames the information inside and makes the entire card stand out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what everyone is talking about.  I like the new cards and I really like the blue bars at the top and the bottom.  It really frames the information inside and makes the entire card stand out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Mailhot</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Mailhot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Thank you for taking feedback into account. I quite like the new version. (Though maybe two bars is a bit much)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking feedback into account. I quite like the new version. (Though maybe two bars is a bit much)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thub</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Thub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I agree with Máirín about the two bars.  What about having one blue bar at the top, but leaving a 1/4 inch white gap at the top?  That should make it easier to make &#039;em by hand and still pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Máirín about the two bars.  What about having one blue bar at the top, but leaving a 1/4 inch white gap at the top?  That should make it easier to make &#8216;em by hand and still pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loupgaroublond</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>loupgaroublond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I would shrink the bars down a little bit.  The card will feel like it opens up a bit when you have more white space in the middle.  Otherwise the cards feel a bit cramped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would shrink the bars down a little bit.  The card will feel like it opens up a bit when you have more white space in the middle.  Otherwise the cards feel a bit cramped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicu</title>
		<link>http://ianweller.org/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>nicu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iwtest.nfshost.com/2008/07/01/fedora-business-cards-take-two/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Ops... I commented in the wrong place, copying it here:

I think I liked better the previous idea (with blue back side) due to its simplicity.
But I understand having the cards printed on both faces is a) more work and b) more pricey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ops&#8230; I commented in the wrong place, copying it here:</p>
<p>I think I liked better the previous idea (with blue back side) due to its simplicity.<br />
But I understand having the cards printed on both faces is a) more work and b) more pricey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
